Letters about websites usually cite one of two things: a visitor with a disability who couldn't use a page, or tracking that ran before a visitor agreed to it. ADA Shield by Help Lawyer keeps a dated, tamper-evident record of what your site does and what you've done about it, so you can answer a letter with evidence.
Our free check shows which tracking technologies load on your site before a visitor can consent.
Run a free check on any page in under a minute. It reviews accessibility, shows which tracking technologies loaded before a visitor could consent, and looks for AI and chat tools.
ADA Shield by Help Lawyer is in active development. Foundation (accessibility widget, hosted statement, conformance seal, the full document suite, the response template library, and cookie consent) is fully live for all members today. Pro (scanning and custom reporting) is in development.
Federal appeals courts haven’t agreed on whether the ADA covers businesses that exist only online. That question gets argued after a letter arrives, at your cost, and plaintiffs choose where they file.
Your website is part of your business. A federal appeals court has applied the ADA to a website connected to physical locations. If someone can’t use your booking or contact form, that’s the barrier a letter will describe.
Website privacy letters are about what fired on a page, whether the visitor agreed first, and what you disclosed. California is narrowing one of its privacy rules in 2027, and plaintiffs are already moving to other sections of California law and to the federal Wiretap Act.
Cookie consent that holds tracking until a visitor agrees, plain-language tracking and cookie disclosures, and response templates for CIPA and other website wiretap letters.
A published accessibility statement, a conformance seal, an accessibility widget and response templates for ADA letters.
A published AI Use Disclosure that tells visitors which AI tools you use and how to reach a person.
Privacy Policy, Terms, Cookie Policy and an accommodation policy, generated from your business profile and kept with a dated version history.
Every change in all four is written to your Defense Ledger, dated and tamper-evident.
You don’t have to lose the legal argument to need a record. You need one the day the letter arrives.
Most website privacy claims follow one pattern. A visitor lands on a page, and before they agree to anything, a chat widget, ad pixel, session-replay script or call-tracking tool sends what they do or type to a third party. The claim alleges that the third party intercepted a private communication without consent. Demand letters cite the California Invasion of Privacy Act (Penal Code § 631), the federal Wiretap Act, Florida's Security of Communications Act and Pennsylvania's Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.
Business websites tend to run exactly this stack. Chat tools, Meta and Google ad pixels and call tracking are standard on service and e-commerce sites, and a contact form often collects the most sensitive information a visitor will share anywhere online.
The law is unsettled. Courts are divided on how these statutes apply to pixels and chat tools, and some claims are dismissed early. Unsettled law still produces letters, and each one takes time to answer. California's SB 690, signed September 30, 2026, ends private suits under Penal Code § 638.51 for website conduct from January 1, 2027. Claims under Section 631 are unaffected.
A letter cites the statute, names tools found on your site and proposes a settlement before anything is filed.
If the letter is not resolved, a complaint follows, often framed as a proposed class action. In Florida, plaintiffs have also turned to small-claims court.
Many cases are fought here. Courts are divided, so the outcome turns on the court, the tool involved and the facts of consent.
Cases that survive carry statutory-damages exposure and class certification risk, and most resolve by settlement.
Source: Barnes & Thornburg, CIPA/ECPA Website-Tracking Privacy Litigation in 2026
| Statute | Statutory damages |
|---|---|
| California Invasion of Privacy Act, Penal Code § 637.2 | $5,000 per violation, or three times actual damages, whichever is greater |
| Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2520 | The greater of actual damages, $100 per day of violation, or $10,000 |
| Florida Security of Communications Act, § 934.10 | The greater of actual damages, $100 per day of violation, or $1,000 |
| Pennsylvania WESCA, 18 Pa.C.S. § 5725 | The greater of actual damages, $100 per day of violation, or $1,000, plus punitive damages and attorney's fees |
These are the amounts each statute permits, not predicted outcomes. What a claim is worth depends on its facts and the court hearing it.
Sources: Barnes & Thornburg; Crandall Consulting
A record will not make a claim disappear. It shows what your site ran, what visitors were asked, and when.
Title III of the ADA applies to places of public accommodation. Federal courts are divided on when a website counts as one: some apply Title III to websites on their own, others require a connection to a physical location. Plaintiffs file where the law favors them, and New York, Florida and California were the most active states for these filings in 2025.
How a claim resolves depends on its facts. A record shows what you did and when.
Some cases go much further. In 2025, Fashion Nova agreed to a $5.15 million class settlement in a web accessibility case brought by blind screen-reader users. The U.S. Department of Justice later filed a Statement of Interest asking the court to reject the settlement's terms.
Sources: Bureau of Internet Accessibility; Law Office of Lainey Feingold
These are real cases, from small shops to a national retailer, drawn from news reports and court records.
A legally blind plaintiff who uses a screen reader alleges he could not find or use this Florida dental practice's online appointment form. These are allegations in a federal complaint.
Filed April 16, 2025 in the Middle District of Florida, No. 6:25-cv-00665.
Source: Dr. Bicuspid
A legally blind plaintiff sued this Los Angeles restaurant, alleging its website was not accessible under the ADA. The owner described the court summons arriving in the mail.
ABC7 reported it as one of dozens of similar suits against Southern California businesses.
Source: ABC7 Los Angeles, January 2024
The owner of this clothing store told ABC7 she had faced two separate lawsuits alleging her store's website violated the ADA, the second filed by a different plaintiff and attorney.
The owner said she planned to fight the second suit.
Web accessibility class action filed in 2020. Screen-reader users alleged they could not browse products or complete purchases.
Agreed to a $5.15 million class settlement in 2025. In February 2026 the DOJ asked the court to reject its terms.
Source: Bureau of Internet Accessibility; Law Office of Lainey Feingold; U.S. Department of Justice
ADA Shield by Help Lawyer may cost less than you think after tax benefits.
Subscription costs for accessibility and business software are deductible in full under IRC Section 162 as an ordinary and necessary business expense — the same category as any other operating tool your business relies on.
This is general tax information, not tax advice. Confirm your specific treatment with your accountant or tax preparer.
IRS Disabled Access Credit
Up to $5,000/yr
IRS Form 8826 (Section 44) lets eligible small businesses claim 50% of eligible accessibility expenditures between $250 and $10,250 — every year expenses are incurred.
Eligible: gross receipts of $1M or less, or 30 or fewer full-time employees in the prior year.
Source: IRS Form 8826, Section 44 (Disabled Access Credit)
Not tax advice. Consult a qualified tax professional to confirm your eligibility and file IRS Form 8826.
Sources: IRS: Deducting business expenses · IRS Form 8826 · ADA.gov: Tax incentives for businesses · 26 U.S.C. §44 (Cornell LII)
ADA Shield by Help Lawyer manages every layer of WCAG 2.1 AA alignment and website privacy for your business.
Deploy a fully functional WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility toolbar to any website in minutes. Works on WordPress, Brilliant Directories, and any platform. Includes text resizing, high contrast, dyslexia font, reading guide, and motor navigation tools.
A structured WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility statement hosted at a permanent adashield.org URL. Generated in seconds, updated instantly, publicly verifiable, with every version kept on record.
10 response templates covering ADA accessibility claims and website tracking (CIPA) claims, from serial-litigant letters to filed complaints. The library also includes a litigation hold notice for your staff and web vendor and a notice-of-claim letter for your insurer. Preview every template before a letter ever arrives.
Every statement version, published document, and demand letter logged adds to a dated history of your good-faith effort. If a claim arrives, that history lets you show what you did and when.
AI Transparency · Included in Foundation
On August 2, 2026, the transparency rules in Article 50 of the EU AI Act began to apply. A business whose chatbot talks to visitors in Europe now has to tell them they are talking to a machine. Utah, Maine and California have their own bot disclosure laws, and the FTC has made clear that passing a bot off as a person can be a deceptive practice.
Most small businesses never set out to use AI. They installed a chat tool and the AI came with it. ADA Shield by Help Lawyer lets you declare each AI tool on your site, publishes a plain-language AI Use Disclosure, and writes every change into your Defense Ledger, alongside your accessibility history.
List the chatbots, voice agents and AI content tools you use, who supplies them, whether conversations are recorded, and how a visitor reaches a person.
Your AI Use Disclosure is hosted for you or embedded on your own site. When we revise the regional content for the places you serve, your disclosure is reissued with a new version number.
Every declaration and every published version is dated and hash-linked in your Defense Ledger, and it appears in your Defense Export.
A chat window that a keyboard or screen reader user cannot operate is an accessibility problem in its own right. Your disclosure tells every visitor how to reach a person instead.
Foundation includes the full ADA Shield by Help Lawyer document suite. Each document is generated from your business profile, published at a permanent adashield.org URL or embedded on your own site, and kept with a dated version history. Document Coverage shows which documents apply to your business based on how your website actually works.
Every document is fully editable. You or your own counsel can revise any section, and each edit is saved as a new version. Documents are templates for you to review and adapt. ADA Shield by Help Lawyer does not provide legal advice or legal services.
The Defense Ledger is append-only. Entries are written by the platform when each event occurs and validated against the underlying record. They are then sealed into a per-practice SHA-256 hash chain. Members cannot write, edit, or delete entries, and the database blocks edits and deletions for every application role, including ADA Shield by Help Lawyer's own.
Your business's export bundles its published documents, the complete ledger, an integrity certificate, and a factual system description. A machine-readable verification file lets any expert recompute the chain without taking our word for it.
Most accessibility tools solve one problem. Here's what it actually costs to piece together what Foundation membership in ADA Shield by Help Lawyer includes in one place.
Accessibility widget
Hosted, versioned accessibility statement
Conformance seal (accurate status, not "compliant")
Privacy Policy / Terms / Cookie Policy generator
Cookie consent banner + script tracking
Demand letter response template library (ADA and website tracking)
Tamper-evident activity record with independently verifiable export
Published annual price (as of Sept 2026)
Buying the widget and the policy tools separately: $519–$1,850+/year, before a demand letter template or audit trail exists anywhere in that stack. Foundation: $2,497/year for ADA Shield by Help Lawyer, all of it in one place.
Third-party pricing reflects publicly published rates as of September 2026 and is subject to change without notice. Figures shown are ranges based on publicly available rate cards; enterprise or custom pricing may differ. See individual vendor sites for current pricing.
Every entry is mathematically linked to the one before it. Changing or deleting any past entry breaks that link, and the integrity check shows where it broke.
No. Nobody can, through the platform. If something needs correcting, a new dated entry records the correction and points to the original.
Earlier entries were sealed on the date the chain was introduced. Your export marks them clearly, and integrity is verified from that date forward.
No. It shows what you did and when, in a form your attorney can verify. How a claim resolves depends on its facts.
Yes. It is part of Foundation, alongside your accessibility statement, privacy policy, terms and cookie policy.
No document can promise that. Your disclosure states plainly which AI tools you use and how visitors reach a person, and your record shows when you said it. What a particular law requires of your business depends on your circumstances. You can hire any attorney in the Help Lawyer network directly for advice on that.
You can record that too. A dated statement that you use no customer-facing AI becomes part of your record, and you can update it the day that changes.